HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  Log in  
Share | 

 The Nanny State, Part DEux

Go down 


Location : fly over country
Registration date : 2012-10-23

PostSubject: The Nanny State, Part DEux   Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:46 pm

Following Yak's excellent article. Watching the news this AM. The media were extolling the virtues of the many cameras that were involved in surveillance of the public in the area of the Boston terrorist attack. I'm sure that they don't want to use the word 'surveillance' but would rather use 'public safety' so we don't start to think of military drones over our amber waves of grain.
Went over the cost & quality per camera, etc. and how helpful they've been in tracking down criminals. Wait till Bloomberg levies a 'public safety tax' for surveillance cameras to augment the citizens right to safety, privacy be damned!
If any of our British brethren care to comment on cameras/police/government surveillance in their "Nanny State" please do!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
The Nanny State, Part DEux
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» HaLeigh Cummings / Report of Crimes to State's Attorney Joseph Boatwright / RICO
» Minister: Tracey Fay was failed by the State
» Repeating only part of background
» Mass, CT or RI?
» Labours Legacy

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Brothers of Briar :: Community :: Tobacco Legislation :: Federal, or Nationwide Level Issues-
Jump to: