Age : 51
Location : Nawlins
Registration date : 2019-05-15
|Subject: A more economical substitute for a Dunhill 5208 Shell Tue May 21, 2019 8:56 pm|| |
I adore this pipe, but want to give it a rest every once and a while (not 24 hours per bowl like my friend says). Since this was a gift from several people I can't afford the dunhill big bucks.
Age : 48
Location : Laguna Niguel, CA
Registration date : 2016-11-08
|Subject: Re: A more economical substitute for a Dunhill 5208 Shell Tue May 21, 2019 11:11 pm|| |
Parker and Hardcastle are Dunhill "seconds" brands (to my understanding). Perhaps something like this might suffice...
Age : 73
Location : Split between Raleigh, NC and OKC, OK
Registration date : 2007-12-15
|Subject: Re: A more economical substitute for a Dunhill 5208 Shell Wed May 22, 2019 12:13 pm|| |
I have several Parker "Briar Barks," Hardcastles (before DH acquired them), and Savory's. All dang fine smokers!!